Your brand has a citation gap.
We ran 60 AI queries across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini, here's who's winning the AI shortlist.
Note: this sample is condensed to 2 pages. A full CitelyMed audit typically exceeds 15 pages.
60
AI prompts run across
4 major engines
5
Spine device brands
tracked in this audit
0
Claude citations for
Amplify Surgical
Citation Leaderboard, Total Score
1
Globus Medical
Large-cap spine
2
Medtronic
Large-cap spine
4
Amplify Surgical TARGET
Small-cap spine
5
DePuy Synthes
Large-cap ortho
Raw Citation Counts
| Company |
ChatGPT |
Claude |
Perplexity |
Gemini |
Total / 60 |
| Globus Medical |
7 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
25 |
| Medtronic |
4 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
19 |
| Joimax |
5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
17 |
| Amplify Surgical TARGET |
1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
10 |
| DePuy Synthes |
2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
9 |
Key Finding
Amplify Surgical is invisible on Claude (0 citations) despite ranking highest on Gemini (8). Strong performance on one engine does not transfer, citation share must be earned platform by platform.
Why This Matters
Surgeons and procurement teams use AI to generate vendor shortlists before visiting any website.
A brand absent from AI answers is removed from consideration before sales contact begins.
Citation share is invisible in web analytics, but it directly shapes inbound volume.
Summary & Recommended Next Steps
Key Shortcomings
Amplify Surgical’s web presence is heavily focused on branded concepts such as dualX®, dualPortal®, and dualLIF™, with relatively little indication-level or procedure-level content written in the generic language surgeons and procurement teams use when querying AI assistants.
As a result, AI models recognize the brand but lack enough structured, query-aligned evidence to confidently recommend it alongside larger incumbents in top-of-funnel vendor answers.
Suggested Next Moves
- Build indication-focused hubs (e.g., endoscopic TLIF, LLIF with small portal access) that explain when and why these approaches are used, then anchor dualX®/dualPortal® within that context.
- Add AI-friendly FAQs and comparisons ("Who is a candidate for endoscopic TLIF?", "dual-expanding cage vs static PEEK") on each procedure page.
- Publish concise case summaries and outcomes from landmark procedures, marked up with appropriate medical/FAQ schema so AI engines can reliably surface Amplify as a credible option.